elf: Co-ed Naked Quidditch with crossed brooms and flying snitch (Co-ed Naked Quidditch)
elf ([personal profile] elf) wrote in [community profile] ebooks2011-04-02 06:35 pm

Blast from the past

Got caught up reading Making Light recently, where they're talking about ebook scams and piracy (the real kind, where people sell authors' works w/o permission, not the unauthorized-free-copy kind that's harder to prove damage from), and I wound up looking for Rowling's reasons for not releasing ebooks.

Her two stated reasons were "piracy concerns" and something about wanting people to experience "real" books, which I couldn't find a decent quote about; I know it exists somewhere. What I did find instead, from USA Today in 2005:
J.K. Rowling has not permitted any of the six Potter books to be released in electronic form, not even during the peak of the e-book craze a few years ago.
Emphasis added. Oh, my sides hurt. The peak of the ebook craze: 2001-2003. Damn, the web is bringin' the funny today. I am tempted to send Konrath a link so he can share the giggle over the short-sightedness of mainstream publishing.
yourlibrarian: JaredEh-kelzies (SPN-JaredEh-kelzies)

[personal profile] yourlibrarian 2011-04-03 03:52 am (UTC)(link)
That's hilarious. I wonder what they were talking about?
yourlibrarian: Angel and Lindsey (Default)

[personal profile] yourlibrarian 2011-04-03 07:04 pm (UTC)(link)
Speaking as someone who was in library science research at the time, I can tell you no one thought it was at any kind of rise or tipping point then. I still remember when Time magazine came out with the article about the Kindle. My class of reference students weren't impressed and still thought eReaders were a long way from becoming popular, and that was among a group of people who might be expected to be big readers and early technology adopters.